| |
| | 1. The lounge is for the CodeProject community to discuss things of interest to the community, and as a place for the whole community to participate. It is, first and foremost, a respectful meeting and discussion area for those wishing to discuss the life of a Software developer. The #1 rule is: Be respectful of others, of the site, and of the community as a whole. 2. Technical discussions are welcome, but if you need specific programming question answered please use Quick Answers[^], or to discussion your programming problem in depth use the programming forums[^]. We encourage technical discussion, but this is a general discussion forum, not a programming Q&A forum. Posts will be moved or deleted if they fit better elsewhere. 3. No sys-admin, networking, "how do I setup XYZ" questions. For those use the SysAdmin[^] or Hardware and Devices[^] forums. 4. No politics (including enviro-politics[^]), no sex, no religion. This is a community for software development. There are plenty of other sites that are far more appropriate for these discussions. 5. Nothing Not Safe For Work, nothing you would not want your wife/husband, your girlfriend/boyfriend, your mother or your kid sister seeing on your screen. 6. Any personal attacks, any spam, any advertising, any trolling, or any abuse of the rules will result in your account being removed. 7. Not everyone's first language is English. Be understanding. Please respect the community and respect each other. We are of many cultures so remember that. Don't assume others understand you are joking, don't belittle anyone for taking offense or being thin skinned. We are a community for software developers. Leave the egos at the door. cheers,
Chris Maunder The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP modified 16-Sep-19 9:31am.
| | Sign In·View Thread |  | | |
| |
| | Or maybe I'm just getting paranoid. singing Liars, Vipers, Jokers and Fakes: we have a man in a room with a photograph of you and a very long list
we really get around everybody is written down, nobody ever gets missed
we know you through and through - know more about you than you know about yourself
we got a magical machine that has every word you speak and can write it all down
so you better watch your mouth or we'll come knock on your door. we are the liars and vipers and jokers and fakes everywhere you go
the liars and vipers and jokers and fakes on your radio
we are the liars and vipers and jokers and fakes in the driver's seat
we are the liars and vipers and the clowns at the wheels of history
WHITEY - LIARS, VIPERS, JOKERS & FAKES (OFFICIAL AUDIO) - YouTube[^] I'm not sure if how I feel is because of the encroaching surveillance state coming to us live by way of well... you and me when it comes down to it, or whether it's because of the general political landscape in the west, or what. This song gets to me. Real programmers use butterflies
| | Sign In·View Thread | | | |
| |
| | ... I've just flown back to Australia after nearly 2 years locked out. I'm here, but so is Omicron, so as I was travelling the borders again shut down and instead of being in the Melbourne office safe and sound, I'm locked up in a hotel in Sydney with a warning that if I leave the room the Police get called. Hopefully sanity prevails and I can continue to Melbourne in 3 days, but unfortunately the last 36hrs have been a bit of an unwelcome adventure and the survey was pushed down the stack (somewhere above "have a shower", but below "work out how to get food and water given the hotel restaurant is shut and I can't leave the room") So I'm opening this one to the floor: Who has a good survey question (and answer options!). Come in, Spinner... cheers
Chris Maunder
| | Sign In·View Thread | | | |
| |
| |  I don't think you're allowed hints from the peanut gallery or a "phone-a-friend" when doing one of those locked-room challenge thingies.
| | Sign In·View Thread | | | |
| |
| | I've had one rattling round the back of my head for a while. I'll email it to chris@cp. Software rusts. Simon Stephenson, ca 1994. So does this signature. me, 2012
| | Sign In·View Thread | | | |
| |
|
| |
| | Chris Maunder wrote: Who has a good survey question Which function design pattern do you prefer? [ ] Bouncer Pattern
[ ] Fail Fast
[ ] Guard Clause
[ ] Happy Path
[✓] Single Entry/Exit Probably a few more I've never heard of. Maybe the others can chime in. | | Sign In·View Thread | | | |
| |
|
| |
| | And the answer is "because Australia has become a totalitarian State.? | | Sign In·View Thread | | | |
| |
| | Trying not to start the soapbox, but ... From what I've seen in the your media, our situation has totally been misrepresented. I'm thinking in particular of one of your politicians calling for Australia to be invaded to free us - please don't. Here in Queensland we had the big lockdown last year and a few smaller ones since. Other than that we are free to go out for dinner, movies, have weddings (my daughter got married this year), go to sporting events, etc etc. At the moment masks are not mandatory (although I still wear it on the train). Down south there've had it a bit rougher and have had higher numbers, but with high vaccination rates these restrictions are being lifted. // TODO: Insert something here Top ten reasons why I'm lazy
1.
| | Sign In·View Thread | | | |
| |
| | I am looking for a business rule engine(open source) in .NET. any recommendation/experience to share? diligent hands rule....
| | Sign In·View Thread | | | |
| |
|
| |
| | it seems like I need to build a parser for these rules too... diligent hands rule....
| | Sign In·View Thread | | | |
| |
|
| |
| | If you do intend to go that route let me know, and let me see a sample of your rules, and I'll whip you up an XBNF grammar you can either use with one of my parser generators, or as a guide to implement a recursive descent parser on your own. I'll even recommend which route to take, and which tools to use depending on what your rules wind up needing to look like. Real programmers use butterflies
| | Sign In·View Thread | | | |
| |
| | thank you for the offer and definitely check with you! I browsed your post. diligent hands rule....
| | Sign In·View Thread | | | |
| |
| | You can use that one but it's a bit dated. When you're ready for it, assuming you're targeting C#, I'll hook you up with Norm and Reggie (or Parsley and Rolex depending on what you want) They are quite a bit more mature than PCK, although PCK does have a syntax highlighting editor. In practice, that isn't very helpful which is why I haven't included it in more recent projects. Real programmers use butterflies
| | Sign In·View Thread | | | |
| |
| | in a simple example, my dataset is a List of data points(2D such as x,y)), I want to detect at which point that reach local max , local min etc..
I created a table associated with this dataset and calculated all needed mathematical attributes such as derivatives at each point. so I want to use type of rules in natural language like that describe and evaluate my request: max(my_List). hope my explanation is clear. I have not done anything on business rule stuff. diligent hands rule....
| | Sign In·View Thread | | | |
| |
| | Parsing is like 10% of natural language processing. I'm not sure you know what you're getting into. The other problem with doing it for business rules is ambiguity. Do you want that ambiguity leaking into your accounts receivable tables? Because this is how it happens. The quickest dirtiest way to get natural language processing into your business rules is to use Amazon's voice recognition services, and then plug it into a rule writer based off of that. Then take that rule writer and plug it into a system you do not care about, because it's not going to give you anything good, particularly given that the type of people who would require natural language processing to produce business rules lack the analytical chops to craft solid business rules in the first place. Real programmers use butterflies
| | Sign In·View Thread | | | |
| |
|
| |
| | Fair enough, although if you're really committed to natural language parsing, Glory: A GLR Parser Generator for .NET[^] is what you'd need for that, because of the ambiguity. PCK can't parse natural languages, and extending the algorithms therein to do so is non-trivial, so it won't make a good starting point necessarily. Also, avoid the LALR(1) generation in PCK. It's slow and I don't think it handles epsilons correctly. Glory does. Real programmers use butterflies
| | Sign In·View Thread | | | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| | I did this research already. just check around if any better ideas exist... diligent hands rule....
| | Sign In·View Thread | | | |
0 Response to "How To Clean A Lounge At Home"
Post a Comment